The UK House of Commons has voted to decriminalise abortion for women at any stage of pregnancy throughout England and Wales, following the passage of a contentious amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill, in one of the most significant changes in abortion law in the country in decades.
The vote, which took place Tuesday, has triggered a wave of alarm from Christian leaders, pro-life advocates, and medical professionals who warn of the grave implications for unborn children and the wellbeing of women.
Tabled by Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi, the amendment passed by a wide margin of 379 to 137. It removes criminal penalties under the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act for a woman who ends the life of her unborn child. The change applies even to cases where abortion pills are taken after the current 24-week legal limit, dismantling protections that have stood for over 160 years.
While the procedural safeguards of the 1967 Abortion Act remain in place for clinical abortions -- requiring approval from two doctors for abortions up to 24 weeks -- critics warn that this week's amendment effectively opens the door to unregulated, late-term, and at-home abortions without medical oversight or legal accountability.
The amendment passed after just two hours of debate in the House of Commons, prompting criticism over the lack of scrutiny and public consultation.
Former MP Caroline Ansell, now Director of Advocacy and Policy at the Christian charity CARE, denounced the speed and method of the decision. "This is a major change in legislation, tacked on as an afterthought to a bill dealing with crime and public safety," she said. "It's truly heartbreaking."
Antoniazzi defended the change as a matter of compassion and justice, citing police investigations into women for alleged illegal abortions.
.
Jerome Mayhew MP (@JeromeMayhew) sums up today's debate: We've made a major change to the abortion law, on the basis of no evidence session, no committee stage scrutiny, just 46 minutes of backbench debate and a government minister wind-up who refused to take any interventions. pic.twitter.com/M9hIJf08Ky
— Right To Life UK (@RightToLifeUK) June 17, 2025
.
The vote has drawn sharp opposition from a broad coalition of Christian leaders and organisations. Archbishop John Sherrington, the Catholic Bishops' Conference lead on life issues, called it "deeply alarming," warning that it "significantly reduces the protection of unborn lives" and heightens women's exposure to coerced and unsafe abortions.
Dawn McAvoy of Both Lives UK criticised the amendment as a betrayal of both mothers and their children. "Abortion should remain within criminal law because it involves the deliberate ending of a human life," she said. "This is not healthcare -- this is abandonment."
The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC) echoed similar concerns, highlighting the potential for abuse, including sex-selective abortions and termination of viable babies moments before birth. Alithea Williams of SPUC described the law as "extreme and barbaric," arguing that the amendment disregards protections afforded under the Infant Life Preservation Act.
Catherine Robinson, spokesperson for Right to Life UK, accused MPs of hijacking a public safety bill to push through "a radical and seismic change" without democratic process. "There has been no consultation with the public on this seismic law change," she said, vowing to fight the amendment through the House of Lords.
More than 1,000 medical professionals signed an open letter urging MPs to reject the amendment, citing serious health risks to both mothers and unborn children. They warned that removing legal safeguards could lead to a rise in unsafe, self-managed late-term abortions and prevent the reporting of adverse outcomes.
Pro-life advocates also called for reinstating in-person consultations for chemical abortions, a safeguard that was dropped during the COVID-19 pandemic and has remained absent since.
.
Ciar�n Kelly said: �An unbearably large number of babies � more than ten million � have been killed in Britain since the passing of the 1967 Abortion Act. Now MPs have voted to ditch one of the few remaining safeguards protecting the unborn."https://t.co/jYEEgONIJ0
— The Christian Institute (@christianorguk) June 18, 2025
.
The amendment now moves to the House of Lords, the UK Parliament's upper chamber, where peers are expected to scrutinise its implications closely. While the Lords cannot block the bill outright, they have the authority to delay and amend its provisions.
Lord Alton of Liverpool, a long-time advocate for life issues, warned of the "profound implications" the amendment could have on longstanding legal and ethical frameworks. "We know that there are potential real risks for the safety of women," he said. "I expect colleagues in the House of Lords will wish to scrutinise its provisions very closely and to amend it as necessary to make it safe."
The vote marks the most dramatic shift in abortion law in England and Wales in nearly six decades. While supporters argue it is a step toward justice and autonomy for women, opponents see it as a dangerous dismantling of legal protections for the unborn and vulnerable women.
"We believe that both lives matter in every pregnancy," said Caroline Ansell. "Just societies protect both mothers and babies and provide holistic support to enable their flourishing."