Human Embryology and Church Teachings

III. Bibliography Cont'd

C. Organizations and Institutions

*American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, "Ethics", in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2nd ed., No. 97 (2004), pp. 957, 958; Erroneously defines "preembryo" as "product of fertilization before 14 days and arrival of primitive streak."

*American Fertility Society, Ethics Committee, "Ethical Considerations of the New Reproductive Technologies," Fertility and Sterility 46, Supplement 1 (September1986): 27S, (name changed to American Society of Reproductive Medicine in 1990s; still publish their scientific journal, Fertility and Sterility; chairs of ethics committees included Richard McCormick, S.J. and Clifford Grobstein).

*American Medical Association, Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, CEJA Report 1-I-94, "Pre-Embryo Splitting" (1994), available from http://www.ama-assn.org/apps/pf_new/pf_online?f_n=browse&doc=policyfiles/HnE/E-2.145.HTM (accessed February 5, 2008); Endorses "pre-embryo splittting" as infertility treatment.

*American Society of Reproductive Medicine, Ethics Committee Report, "Human Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer," Fertility and Sterility 74, no. 5 (November 2000): 873-876, available from http://www.asrm.org/Media/Ethics/cloning.pdf (accessed February 5, 2008).

*American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Ethics Committee, "Embryo Splitting for Infertility Treatment," Fertility and Sterility 82, Supplement 1 (September 2004): S256-7, available from PubMed #15363746.

*American Society of Reproductive Medicine, "Chapter 16: Experimentation on the Preembryo," Fertility and Sterility 87, no. 4, Supplement 1 (April 2007): S52-S58.

*British House of Lords, The Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Research Purposes) Regulations 2001, no. 188, summary available from http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2001/20010188.htm (accessed February 5, 2008) (now out of print but can order photocopies; see Irving 2001b for details of the regulations, based on pre-embryo).

*California Advisory Committee, Cloning Californians: Report of the California Advisory Committee on Human Cloning (Sacramento, Calif. January 11, 2002); Chaired by Irving Weissman, terms "preembryo" and "ball of cells" to refer to the early embryo used throughout report, available from http://scbe.stanford.edu/conference/cloning_cali.pdf (accessed February 5, 2008).

Commonwealth of Australia, Senate Select Committee on the Human Embryo Experimentation Bill 1985, Official Hansard Report, Human Embryo Experimentation in Australia (Canberra 1986).

Commonwealth of Australia, The Cloning of Humans (Prohibition) Bill 2001 (Queensland 2001), available from http://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/Bills/50PDF/2001/CloningB01.pdf (accessed February 5, 2008).

Council of Europe, Additional Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine, on the Prohibition of Cloning Human Beings, European Treaty Series no. 168 (1998), available from http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Word/168.doc (accessed February 5, 2008).

Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly, Recommendation 1046 (1986): On the Use of Human Embryos and Fetuses for Diagnostic, Therapeutic, Scientific, Industrial and Commercial Purposes (1986), available from http://assembly.coe.int/main.asp?Link=/documents/adoptedtext/ta86/erec1046.htm (accessed February 5, 2008).

Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly, Recommendation 1100 (1989):On the Use of Human Embryos and Foetuses in Scientific Research (1989), available from http://assembly.coe.int/Main.asp?link=/Documents/AdoptedText/ta89/EREC1100.htm (accessed February 5, 2008).

Council of Research, Technology, and Innovation, German Research Foundation, Cloning of Humans: Biological Foundations and Ethico-legal Assessment, (April 1997), available from http://www.dfg.de/aktuelles_presse/reden_stellungnahmen/archiv/download/klonierung_beim_menschen_97e.pdf (accessed February 5, 2008).

*Department of Health and Social Security, Select Committee on Science and Technology, "Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology" Warnock Report, Cmnd 9314 (July 1984): 4, 27, 63.

Food and Drug Administration, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, Workshop on Evidence Based Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) (Washington, D.C. September 18, 2002), available from http://www.fda.gov/cber/minutes/art091802.pdf (accessed February 5, 2008).

German National Ethics Council, Cloning for Reproductive Purposes and Cloning for the Purposes of Biomedical Research (Berlin 2004), available from http://www.ethikrat.org/_english/publications/Opinion_Cloning.pdf (accessed February 5, 2008).

*Gerontology Research Group, GRG Editorial: "Let's Defuse the Rhetoric by Sharpening Our Vocabulary" (December 2001), available from http://www.grg.org/breakingnews2001.htm (accessed February 5, 2008).

*Institute of Medicine and National Research Council, Committee on the Basic Science Foundations of Medically Assisted Conception, Report of a Study and Workshop Papers, "Medically Assisted Conception: An Agenda for Research," (1989), available from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=1433 (accessed February 5, 2008).

*National Academy of Sciences, Commission on Life Sciences, "Comparison of Stem Cell Production With Reproductive Cloning," in Stem Cells and the Future of Regenerative Medicine (2002a), available from http://books.nap.edu/books/0309076307/html/11.html#pagetop (accessed February 5, 2008).

*National Academy of Sciences, Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy, Scientific and Medical Aspects of Human Reproductive Cloning: How Is Reproductive Cloning Done? (2002b), available from http://books.nap.edu/books/0309076374/html/25.html (accessed February 5, 2008).

*National Bioethics Advisory Commission, Cloning Human Beings: Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission (Rockville, Md. June 1997), p. 3.

*National Institutes of Health, Human Embryo Research Panel Meetings (Washington, D.C. 1994), using term "pre-embryo" in: February 2 meeting, pp. 27, 31, 50-80, 85-87, 104-106; February meeting. 3, 1994 meeting, pp. 6-55; April 11 meeting, pp. 23-41, 9-22.

*National Institutes of Health, Office of Science Policy Analysis, Cloning: Present Uses and Promises (Washington, D.C. January 29, 1998), p. 3; available from http://ospp.od.nih.gov/policy/cloning.asp (accessed February 5, 2008).

*National Institutes of Health, Office of Science Policy Analysis, Cloning: Present Uses and Promises (Washington, D.C. April 27, 1998), available from http://ospp.od.nih.gov/policy/cloning.asp (accessed February 5, 2008).

*National Science Foundation and U. S. Dept. of Commerce, Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science, edited by Mihail C. Roco and William Sims Bainbridge (Washington, D.C., June 2002), available from http://wtec.org/ConvergingTechnologies/1/NBIC_report.pdf (accessed February 5, 2008).

*New Zealand Parliament, "Human Assisted Reproductive Technology Bill (1996); Supplementary Order Paper 2003, no. 80, May 14, 2003, Bills Digest No. 972, available from http://www.parliament.nz/NR/rdonlyres/1FA29ADF-DB31-4186-AA33-AE523F9D2799/49206/972HumanAssistedReproduction3.pdf.

The President's Council on Bioethics, "Executive Summary: Fair and Accurate Terminology; Scientific Background," in Human Cloning and Human Dignity: An Ethical Inquiry (Washington, D.C. July 2002), available from http://www.bioethics.gov/reports/cloningreport/execsummary.html (accessed February 5, 2008).

*The Twins Foundation, "New Ways to Produce Identical Twins-A Continuing Controversy" Research Update 9, no. 1 (1994), available from http://twinsfoundation.com/researchupdate/ru-v9n1-1994.htm; also, see details of this article that discusses the use of cloning by "twinning" in infertility treatments in: Dianne N. Irving, "Legally Valid Informed Consent: Individual Testimony Before the New Jersey State Senate Health and Human Services Committee on Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research, Ethical and Public Policy Considerations", New Jersey State Senate Committee on Health And Human Services, Trenton, New Jersey (Novermber 4, 2002), Footnote 19, available from http://www.lifeissues.net/writers/irv/irv_14legalconsent1.html; also in Dianne N. Irving, "Framing the Debates on Human Cloning and Human Embryonic Stem Cells: Pluripotent vs. Totipotent" (July 23, 2005), pp. 27-28, available from http://www.lifeissues.net/writers/irv/irv_100debatecloning1.html.

*U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Ethics Advisory Board, "Report and Conclusions: HEW Support of Research Involving Human In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer" Federal Register 44 (Washington, D.C. 1979): 35033-35058.

Next Page: D. Philosophy and Theology
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14